Cartoons, Prophets and the Islamic Faith
Cartoons, prophets and Islam article
Shame-Based Culture: by Roland Muller
In September 2005, not long before the month of Ramadan, a Danish newspaper decided to publish cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad. Little did they realize that they were igniting an explosion that would ripple throughout 2006.
As Muslims around the world eventually began to protest in anger and outrage, more Western newspapers and magazines picked up the cartoon and republished them, claiming that they were defending freedom of speech. These publications invoked more outrage. Embassies and churches were burned and people were killed. In the West, we watched with puzzlement. Why were the Muslims so upset about these cartoons of Muhammad? After all, people have mocked Jesus for centuries, but we don’t go around killing people. Surely freedom of speech is far more important than a bit of scorn! After all, many in the West have fought and died to defend the right of free speech. Surely the Muslims realize this.
Shame-based cultures
In the East, the feelings are quite different. Most Muslims live in what are known as shame-based cultures. These cultures are based on shame and honour rather than right and wrong. Almost every decision that they make is made by considering what is honourable and what is shameful. Sociologists tell us that in the West we live in what are known as guilt based cultures where most decisions are made on the basis of right and wrong. Therefore in the West, when necessary, we will lay down our lives to defend our rights. In the East, people will lay down their lives to defend their honour. In addition, Muslims even have a legal term known as "honour killing." They believe that the shedding of blood can wash away shame. Through this concept those who bring shame on a family or a tribe can be put to death, whether they are an enemy or an immediate family member. In some strange way, the Danish cartoons created a very volatile situation where the rights of the West and the shame of the East collided. Both sides are defending what they believe is of utmost importance. Both sides are willing to fight to the death.
Where do we stand as Christians?
Where do we stand as Christians? Jesus died on the cross, not only to remove our guilt, but also to take our shame. When Adam and Eve sinned in the Garden of Eden shame came upon all mankind. Some cultures are far more sensitive to this shame than they are to the guilt that Westerners often experience.
No matter, Jesus died to free us all from the stain of sin, and this includes both shame and guilt. The only way to really rectify the situation is for each side to recognize that the answer is in the death of Jesus on the cross. Jesus is the only one who can both set things right and also restore the honour that was lost. Jesus took our guilt and our shame upon himself. The reason he was mocked and ridiculed was because our shame was being laid on him. If only we were as enthusiastic about sharing the gospel message as we are about defending our rights. What a different place the world would be! The Lord Jesus honoured the Father through his obedience unto death. He has removed our shame and guilt. Let us live in such a way that we honour the Lord in word and deed.
Source
Roland Muller is the author of numerous missionary books. His two books: Honor and Shame, Unlocking the Door, and MMC explore the topic of shame-based cultures further. http://rmuller.com (in a new window)
First of all, it is both irresponsible and impractical to say that freedom of speech is an un-impeachable right in any situation and case. The term ‘freedom of speech’ has been monopolised by certain circles to take on an almost unassailable form. Now, I myself am a journalist but i understand that as part of a global community, we must realise that there is a difference between an insult and a joke, or even artistic expression. Also, to play down the legitimacy of a complaint by one group is an underhanded tactic designed as a diversion; instead of addressing the issue of whether the cartoon drawings were morally tenable or morally corrupt. Furthermore, it is interesting to note that you have shown ‘the east’ as a ’shame-based’ culture, citing honour killings as an evidence for this. In actual facts (what any respectable piece of journalism would adhere to), there is no term called ‘honour killing’ in the Islamic legal system – this is a myth. The issue of honour killings is one exclusive to certain traditions among some cultures, and is considered by Muslims to be a backward and abhorrent practice. It is important to differentiate between the actions of the individual and the teachings of the faith. I personally would be dismayed and astounded if it were claimed that the IRA bombings were upheld and supported by the teachings of the Bible.