<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cartoons, Prophets and the Islamic Faith</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.30-days.net/islam/culture/shame/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.30-days.net/islam/culture/shame/</link>
	<description>What Christians should know about Islamic background, history and culture.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:13:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.30-days.net/islam/culture/shame/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 12:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.30-days.net/reveal/shame/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>First of all, it is both irresponsible and impractical to say that freedom of speech is an un-impeachable right in any situation and case. The term &#039;freedom of speech&#039; has been monopolised by certain circles to take on an almost unassailable form. Now, I myself am a journalist but i understand that as part of a global community, we must realise that there is a difference between an insult and a joke, or even artistic expression. Also, to play down the legitimacy of a complaint by one group is an underhanded tactic designed as a diversion; instead of addressing the issue of whether the cartoon drawings were morally tenable or morally corrupt. Furthermore, it is interesting to note that you have shown &#039;the east&#039; as a &#039;shame-based&#039; culture, citing honour killings as an evidence for this. In actual facts (what any respectable piece of journalism would adhere to), there is no term called &#039;honour killing&#039; in the Islamic legal system - this is a myth. The issue of honour killings is one exclusive to certain traditions among some cultures, and is considered by Muslims to be a backward and abhorrent practice. It is important to differentiate between the actions of the individual and the teachings of the faith. I personally would be dismayed and astounded if it were claimed that the IRA bombings were upheld and supported by the teachings of the Bible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, it is both irresponsible and impractical to say that freedom of speech is an un-impeachable right in any situation and case. The term &#8216;freedom of speech&#8217; has been monopolised by certain circles to take on an almost unassailable form. Now, I myself am a journalist but i understand that as part of a global community, we must realise that there is a difference between an insult and a joke, or even artistic expression. Also, to play down the legitimacy of a complaint by one group is an underhanded tactic designed as a diversion; instead of addressing the issue of whether the cartoon drawings were morally tenable or morally corrupt. Furthermore, it is interesting to note that you have shown &#8216;the east&#8217; as a &#8217;shame-based&#8217; culture, citing honour killings as an evidence for this. In actual facts (what any respectable piece of journalism would adhere to), there is no term called &#8216;honour killing&#8217; in the Islamic legal system &#8211; this is a myth. The issue of honour killings is one exclusive to certain traditions among some cultures, and is considered by Muslims to be a backward and abhorrent practice. It is important to differentiate between the actions of the individual and the teachings of the faith. I personally would be dismayed and astounded if it were claimed that the IRA bombings were upheld and supported by the teachings of the Bible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
